2.32 Discuss
the arguments for and against a single goal of increasing shareholder value.
Shareholders are the owners of the entity. They
risk their capital and take on the responsibility that owning a business
entails. Legally, under the corporations act, constitution, partnership
agreement, etc. they are the party with the rights to make decisions and as
such take on the responsibility to run the business past papers. They take on the full risk
of not making a profit (losing money), and need to ensure all relevant business
legislation is complied with (work place health and safety, product safety,
complying with industrial awards and agreements). The corporation’s law
indicates that directors (who are shareholders and have been voted to be on the
board of directors) have to act in good faith and in the best interests of the
company. Therefore, arguably to put another group’s best interests first may
conflict with this direction. Further, it may be that some decisions past papers need to be
made where there is a direct conflict between one stakeholder group compared to
another. An example would be where a company decides to source their raw
material from a non-local firm due to their processes being more
environmentally friendly. In a number of circumstances what is good for
shareholders may indeed be good for other groups. For example, treating
employees with respect and offering good employment conditions (although at
extra cost to the entity and therefore shareholder in the short term) may be good
for the entity in the long term as employees will want to stay and productivity
may increase for past papers is available.
However, it has been argued that other
stakeholders purchase test banks invest (not money) in the business as well. There is also growing
disillusion with the self-interest principle. That is, everyone acting with
their own self-interest in mind doesn’t lead to a society that values the
collective or the environment. The self-interest principle is very short term.
Having a conscious regard for others and the effect of your decisions can lead
to a society worth living in.
Further to the above, there is an increased
discussion regarding which shareholders the board should be more concerned
about. With the increase in and types of trading transactions there is more
uncertainty about who owns the company as any point in time. For instance,
there is increased ‘day traders’ traffic. So the board in making a decision
purchase test banks regarding say a takeover offer may increase the value for the short term
shareholders (day traders) by accepting the offer but decrease the value for
the longterm shareholders. There is also increased
short selling activity. Does the board have a duty to decrease the value of the
shares to benefit the short selling shareholders?
The increased shifting of ownership has
heightened the argument that shareholders are not the primary stakeholder.
Although legally they have taken the monetary risk, the company structure
allows a coming together of all stakeholders whether labour, suppliers, capital
and the community for purchase test banks.
For further details about past papers and test bank contact us by click here: